Quick Answer: Why You Shouldn’T Use Redux?

Is Redux overkill?

Managing everything in Redux is overkill.

It may have negative performance implications, it will increase the complexity of your app, make it hard to refactor, and likely reduce the reusability of many of your components.

Technically speaking, people were build big fancy complex React apps before Redux came along..

What problems does Redux solve?

So, with that said, the problem solved by Redux is the containment of all state changes into the above patterns, rather than having a large collection of small state changes scattered about your code in individual React components.

Should I use Redux or context API?

Redux is for managing the state of the application, Context is for passing props. On the face of it, there is no conflict. If you ask literally what to choose, Context or Redux — the answer is RTFM. But we all know that the real question is hidden in the context (🙃).

Do hooks replace redux?

TL;DR The useReducer React hook provides a Redux-like means of managing state transitions, but it’s no replacement for Redux when it comes to managing a global application state tree. … Even better, hooks can be composed into larger units of functionality that can be mixed into any number of components.

How do I manage state without redux?

In order to do so, all you have to do is pass your root reducer to the createStore method, then access the global store and wrap your App component in a Provider from react-redux , passing the store as its prop.

What is the benefit of Redux?

Redux makes the state predictable If the same state and action are passed to a reducer, the same result is always produced because reducers are pure functions. The state is also immutable and is never changed. This makes it possible to implement arduous tasks like infinite undo and redo.

What is the purpose of Redux?

Redux is used mostly for application state management. To summarize it, Redux maintains the state of an entire application in a single immutable state tree (object), which can’t be changed directly. When something changes, a new object is created (using actions and reducers).

Should you still use Redux?

You don’t necessarily have to use Redux. Sometimes it makes more sense not to. … If your app is going to consist of mostly simple actions such as UI changes, these don’t really have to be a part of the Redux store and can be handled at the component level. You don’t need to manage server side events (SSE) or websockets.

Can I use react without redux?

However, by deploying the right React techniques, you can actually have a global state in React without having to use Redux.

Is Redux difficult?

Yes, in some ways Redux is more complicated. It adds a couple levels of indirection to the process of updating state, there’s a bunch of new terms, and it requires thinking about your code in some ways that are probably very new and different for you. So yes, many people do find it confusing to start with.

What is difference between Redux and react redux?

What are differences between redux, react-redux, redux-thunk? redux: Library for managing application state. react-redux: Library for managing React application state. redux-thunk: a middleware for logging, crash reporting, talking to an asyn API, routing etc…

Is Redux global state?

Isn’t Redux just glorified global state? Of course it is. But the same holds for every database you have ever used. It is better to treat Redux as an in-memory database – which your components can reactively depend upon.

Can context API replace redux?

As you can see, context is not a replacement for Redux. Context won’t give you time traveling debugging, configurable middleware, or anything more than a way to get data from one place to another. If you want a tool to help you manage your state, then Redux is a great choice.

Does Facebook use Redux?

Dan Abramov on Twitter: “Actually Facebook doesn’t use Redux “at scale”, it uses Flux :-)… ”

Is Redux frontend or backend?

Redux is the Pivotal Frontend Innovation.